| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Seth Ruin
Minmatar
Ominous Corp
Primary.
   |
Posted - 2010.04.16 23:47:00 -
[1]
|
Seth Ruin
Minmatar
Ominous Corp
Primary.
|
Posted - 2010.04.17 07:58:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Marlona Sky
I have not witnessed a TCU being anchored at a deep safe myself, but I would not put it past anyone on either side to exploit a deep safe like that anyways. I thought they had to be at a planet or something anyways in order to be allowed to anchor, but whatever, not my specialty. 
They show up on the overview regardless of how far someone is from them. There's no real tactical advantage of having a TCU so far out, so I'm not sure how it's an "exploit."
Also, you can anchor a TCU pretty much anywhere as long as it's more than 50km from a POS.
|
Seth Ruin
Minmatar
Ominous Corp
Primary.
|
Posted - 2010.04.19 21:21:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Liol Wongsta
It seems to me that there is a fairly simple method to remove the "real" reason for this, make it so sov structures can only be anchored within a set distance from a planet - similar to pos towers and moons.
Simple fix and removes the issue of anchoring things 500+ au away and making sov battles nearly pointless.
Let the deep safes exist.
Fix the fleet lag, making it no longer necessary to USE deep safes, just to have a hope of seeing your enemy in a fight.
I really doubt the TCUs had anything to do with this. I still don't see what the "issue" is with placing a TCU in a deep safe. Anyone can see it on overview, anyone can warp to it. If it were a clear strategic advantage to have a TCU 500AU away, you'd see a hell of a lot more of them in deep safes. In all likelihood, the real reason for anchoring a TCU 500AU away is just "because you can."
|
Seth Ruin
Minmatar
Ominous Corp
Primary.
|
Posted - 2010.05.02 08:22:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Zenst
STICKY?
I noticed this thread nolonger stickied - has it been superceeded again in new thread I missed or are we to take it that CCP is not interested in our feedback upon this matter and are going to Nike it thru? 
Confirming CCP is done listening to feedback on this, err, feature.
|
| |
|